© 2007 SSJR


News Archive

 


June 30, 2008

Congratulations to Our First Year Associate on the CT Bar

Roy D. Gross has just recently passed the Connecticut Bar exam.

 
Top  |  Back to main page



 
Related Links:

Roy D. Gross Bio


May 8, 2008

Firm Member Stephen McNamara Leading Case in Trademark Infringement of 9/11 Flag

Firm Member Stephen McNamara is representing the long established charitable organization, Greenwich-based
Flag of Honor Fund Inc., in a trademark infringement lawsuit brought against another group using their "Flag of Honor" trademark. The Greenwich organization has sold or given away more than 250,000 of the tapestries, which are American flags covered with the names of the victims of the terrorist attacks. For more information follow the link to view the recent news article.

 Top  |  Back to main page



 
Related Links:

View The Article


April 21, 2008

SSJR Obtains Federal Circuit Affirmance of Summary Judgment Rulings of Invalidity and Noninfringement In Patent Infringement Suit

SSJR is pleased to announce that the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has upheld a district court’s rulings of noninfringement and invalidity concerning
U.S. Patent No. 5,740,801, which relates to a system for storing and displaying images during a medical procedure.

A Federal District Court in West Virginia had previously granted SSJR's summary judgment motions that the claims of the patent are either not infringed by Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc. (KSEA), or are invalid. In its ruling, the Federal Circuit first examined the claims directed to the pre-storing of certain doctor preferences, including an analysis of the proper construction of the term “graphical objects,” and upheld the district court’s finding that KSEA's accused products did not infringe those claims. The Court next examined the claims reciting a “still frame buffer,” directed to image freeze-and-capture systems, and upheld the district court’s ruling that these claims were invalid based on prior art that had not been considered by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, but which was brought to the Court's attention by SSJR.

 Top  |  Back to main page



 
Related Links:

View The Opinion

U.S. Patent No. 5,740,801


April 14, 2008

SSJR Adds Attorneys

Roy D. Gross and Tatyana Voloshchuk have joined the firm as Law Clerks.


 
Top  |  Back to main page



 
Related Links:

Roy D. Gross Bio

Tatyana Voloshchuk Bio



November 5, 2007

Congratulations to Our First Year Associates on the CT Bar

Erin R. Conway and Lisa A. McAndrews have both just recently passed the Connecticut Bar exam.

 
Top  |  Back to main page



 
Related Links:

Erin R. Conway Bio

Lisa A. McAndrews Bio


September 14, 2007

SSJR Adds Attorneys

Erin R. Conway and Lisa A. McAndrews have joined the firm as Law Clerks.


 
Top  |  Back to main page



 
Related Links:

Erin R. Conway Bio

Lisa A. McAndrews Bio



May 15, 2007

SSJR Successfully Secures Dismissal of Patent Infringement Case

SSJR is pleased to report it has successfully secured a dismissal of a Hatch-Waxman patent infringement case against its client Sandoz. The case was initiated when GlaxoSmithKline ("GSK") asserted that Sandoz's generic version of GSK's anti-nausea drug
Zofran® (Ondansetron) infringed U.S. Patent No. 5,344,658. Through its work SSJR was successful in convincing GSK to dismiss its infringement case against Sandoz. The dismissal of the case with prejudice from the U.S. District Court of New Jersey clears the way for Sandoz to sell its generic version of Zofran® once final FDA approval is granted.

 Top  |  Back to main page



 
Related Links:

View The Dismissal

U.S. Patent No. 5,344,658


May 10, 2007

SSJR Obtains Judgment of Trademark Infringement in Denmark

The Maritime and Commercial Court of Denmark ruled in SSJR’s favor in a trademark infringement lawsuit brought against a former distributor of its client H.H. Brown Shoe Company.

The Court in H.H. Brown Shoe Company v. Pasternak International found in favor of the plaintiff on the grounds of trademark infringement and unfair competition and dismissed the infringer's counterclaim for breach of contract. The Court cancelled the infringer's Danish trademark registration and awarded damages to the plaintiff.

 
Top  |  Back to main page



 
Related Links:

View The Decision


March 23, 2007

SSJR Files Amicus Brief on Behalf of the Federal Circuit Bar Association

SSJR filed an Amicus Brief on behalf of the Federal Circuit Bar Association in the In Re Seagate Technology case, arguing to limit a defendant's waiver of attorney client communications when willfulness is alleged.

The amicus brief argues that the assertion of an advice of Counsel defense to willful infringement should not extend the waiver of attorney client communications to communication with defendant's trial counsel.

 
Top  |  Back to main page



 
Related Links:

View The Brief


January 1, 2007

Andy I. Corea Becomes Member

SSJR is pleased to announce that Andy I. Corea has become a Member of the firm as of January 1, 2007. Mr. Corea joined SSJR in 2003 and has broad experience in the areas of trademark prosecution, litigation, and licensing.

 
Top  |  Back to main page



 
Related Links:

Andy I. Corea Bio



November 1, 2006

SSJR Obtains Ruling of Patent Infringement

SSJR is pleased to announce that a Federal District Court in Sacramento California has granted SSJR's summary judgment motion that the Pocket Toner PT-1, PT-2 and PT-6 cable testers sold by the Gale Corporation infringe all of the claims of
U.S. Patent No. 6,043,663, relating to a cable testing device.

This determination of infringement follows SSJR's earlier victory in convincing the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that the District Court erred in its construction of the claim term "hand-grip size case" by not giving the claim term its ordinary and customary meaning.

 Top  |  Back to main page



 
Related Links:

U.S. Patent No. 6,043,663


October 19, 2006

Congratulations to Our First Year Associates on the CT Bar Exam

Amanda Greenspon, Walter B. Welsh, and Benjamin C. White have all just recently passed the Connecticut Bar exam.


 
Top  |  Back to main page



 
Related Links:

Walter B. Welsh Bio

Benjamin C. White Bio

Amanda Greenspon Bio



September 22, 2006

SSJR, One of Only Three IP Firms to Grow Litigation Practice

According to a survey of federal court dockets conducted by industry newswire IP Law360, SSJR was one of only three IP boutique firms to increase its patent caseload during the last 12 months surveyed. See
IP Law360 story.

 Top  |  Back to main page



September 17, 2006

SSJR Adds Attorneys

Walter B. Welsh, Benjamin C. White and Amanda Greenspon have joined the firm as Law Clerks.

Andrew Thurkauf has joined the firm as a Patent Agent.


 
Top  |  Back to main page



 
Related Links:

Walter B. Welsh Bio

Benjamin C. White Bio

Amanda Greenspon Bio

Andrew Thurkauf Bio



July 29, 2006

SSJR Successfully Defends Karl Storz Endoscopy-America (KSEA) in Patent Infringement Suit

SSJR is pleased to announce that a Federal District Court in West Virginia has granted SSJR's summary judgment motions that the claims of
U.S. Patent No. 5,740,801, relating to a system for storing and displaying images during a medical procedure, are either not infringed by KSEA or are invalid, thereby successfully disposing of the case against KSEA.

The United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia recently granted SSJR's summary judgment motions for non-infringement and invalidity with respect to the claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,740,801 being asserted against its client KSEA. In its ruling, the Court compared KSEA's accused products against the claims of the patent and found that 53 of the 55 claims of the '801 patent were not infringed. The Court went on to find that the remaining two claims of the '801 patent were invalid based on a prior art patent that was never considered by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, but which was brought to the Court's attention by SSJR. SSJR previously obtained judgments dismissing co-defendant Karl Storz Endovision from the case, and determining that a second patent, U.S. Patent No. 5,877,819, was not infringed. The Court's ruling resulted in a complete victory for KSEA.

 Top  |  Back to main page



 
Related Links:

U.S. Patent No. 5,740,801

U.S. Patent No. 5,877,819

View the Decision



July 12, 2006

SSJR Wins Award as #1 Trademark Filer for 2005

SSJR was recently
awarded the NameProtect® 2005 Trademark Insider® Award as the #1 law firm for U.S. Trademark filing in the Connecticut area.

During INTA's 128
th
 Annual Meeting in Toronto, SSJR was awarded the NameProtect® 2005 Trademark Insider® Award  as the #1 law firm for U.S. Trademark filing in the Stamford/Hartford region. The award is given by NameProtect®  in recognition of substantial achievement in the Trademark industry.

 Top  |  Back to main page



 
Related Links:

NameProtect® Press Release


May 10, 2006

SSJR Settles Copyright Infringement Case for Goose Decoys™

SSJR is pleased to announce that it has settled a copyright infringement case on behalf of Clinton Decoys. The case, filed in District Court in Iowa, alleged that Defendants Nordic Group and Flambeau willfully infringed four of Clinton Decoys' copyrights for goose decoy sculptures.

The parties have resolved the litigation amicably without any admission as to liability. The specific terms of the settlement are confidential.

 
Top  |  Back to main page



November 16, 2005

SSJR Wins Federal Circuit Reversal of Summary Judgment Ruling

SSJR was successful in convincing the Court of Appeals that the District Court erred in its construction of the claim term "hand-grip size case" in U.S. Patent No. 6,043,663 by not giving the claim term its ordinary and customary meaning. As a result, the Appellate Court vacated the finding of non-infringement, reconstrued the claim term and remanded the case back to the the District Court for a redetermination of infringement based on the proper claim construction.

 Top  |  Back to main page



 
Related Links:

U.S. Patent No. 6,043,663

View the Decision


October 25, 2005

SSJR Adds Attorneys

Benjamin J. Lehberger and Christopher H. Strate have joined the firm as Associates.

 Top  |  Back to main page




Related Links:

Benjamin J. Lehberger Bio

Christopher H. Strate Bio



August 31, 2005

SSJR Wins Non-Infringement Judgment for Sandoz (Formerly Eon Labs) on its Generic Version of Warner Lambert's Drug Neurontin™

In a recent Federal Court decision from the District Court of New Jersey, Judge Lifland has ruled on summary judgment that Sandoz's (Eon Labs) generic version of Neurontin™ (gabapentin), does not infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,054,482 owned by Warner Lambert (Pfizer).

In its decision the Court found that Sandoz's generic version of gabapentin does not infringe the Warner Lambert patent because Warner Lambert was unable to meet its burden of proof to show the Sandoz product actually infringed the patent. The patent required that the gabapentin have less than 20 ppm of an anion mineral acid. The Court found that Warner Lambert's use of a pH test to determine the number of chloride anions in a formulation was "simply not precise enough" to determine infringement. Accordingly, the Court granted the motion holding Sandoz's generic formulation does not infringe.

 Top  |  Back to main page




Related Links:

U.S. Patent No. 6,054,482

View the Decision


June 15, 2005

SSJR Wins Appeal Affirming Non-Infringement of Eon Labs ANDA for its Generic Version of Itraconozole

The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in a unanimous decision, affirmed the judgment of the trial court that Eon Labs' generic version of Itraconazole does not infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,633,015 owned by Janssen Pharmaceutica (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson.)

In its decision the Federal Circuit agreed with SSJR's claim construction for the disputed claim term "mesh". The Court acknowledged SSJR's arguments that the disputed claim term should be construed based on what the term means to those skilled in the art when trying to determine particle size. The adoption of SSJR's claim construction resulted in affirmance of the trial court's finding of no literal infringement. Further, the decision also confirmed that Eon's product does not infringe under the doctrine of equivalents based in part on SSJR's ability to show Janssen's expert's testimony was unpersuasive. (More info on the trial see news archive posted on August 20, 2004.)

 Top  |  Back to main page




Related Links:

View the Decision



March 9, 2005

SSJR Obtains TRO and Executes Seizure Against Cannondale Counterfeiter

SSJR was granted an ex-parte Temporary Restraining Order and Seizure Order on February 24, 2005 on behalf of Cannondale Bicycle Corporation in the Northern District of Illinois against a web-based trademark counterfeiting business. The counterfeiting business used several company names and operated out of numerous locations in multiple states to sell counterfeit versions of over 70 brands of goods throughout the world.

A Preliminary Injunction on Consent was entered by the Court on behalf of Plaintiffs Cannondale Bicycle Corporation and Mr. Gasket Inc. against all defendants on March 17, 2005.

 Top  |  Back to main page




Related Links:

View the Preliminary Injunction

View the Temporary Restraining Order

Reg. #2258778

Reg. #2531404



January 26, 2005

SSJR Files Action for Eon Labs Against Pfizer on Zithromax
®
  Patents


SSJR has filed a declaratory judgement action on behalf of Eon Labs asserting Eon's generic version of the drug Azithromycin does not infringe two Pfizer patents covering forms of the antibiotic.

 Top  |  Back to main page




Related Links:

View the Complaint

View US Patent 6,268,489

View US Patent 5,605,889



September 14, 2004

SSJR Wins Appeal Restoring Attorney-Client Privilege to Patent Law

In a virtually unanimous opinion, the Federal Circuit has overruled its contrary precedent in holding that no adverse inference may be drawn against an alleged infringer from either failure to obtain or produce an exculpatory opinion of counsel. Judge Newman wrote the emphatic majority opinion, which explained that implementation of its adverse inference precedent had resulted in inappropriate burdens on the attorney-client relationship.

The Court specifically ruled that it is no longer appropriate for a trier of fact to draw an adverse inference with respect to willful infringement when attorney-client privilege and/or work-product privilege is invoked by a patent infringement defendant, or when the defendant had not obtained legal advice. The Court also ruled that a substantial defense to infringement is not itself sufficient to defeat liability for willful infringement even if no legal advice has been secured.

The Court explicitly did not decide whether a trier of fact can or should be told whether or not an infringement defendant consulted counsel.

The willfulness finding was vacated and the case was remanded to the District Court for redetermination of the willfulness issue under a totality of circumstances without benefit of the inference.

On remand, the District Court ordered the parties to submit briefs on the willfullness issue. That briefing is complete. Both sides are seeking attorney fees.

 Top  |  Back to main page




Related Links:

View the Court's Opinion

View the Briefs and Orders

See a hearing summary


August 20, 2004

SSJR Wins Non-Infringement Judgment in ANDA Case for
Eon Labs, Inc.


In a recent Federal Court decision out of the Eastern District of New York, Judge Gershon has held that our client, Eon Labs, Inc., does not infringe U.S. Patent 5,633,015 to Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V. (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson).

The case related to a drug known as itraconazole and its manufacture in the form of capsules containing hundreds of tiny beads. The critical issue turned on the size of the cores of the beads. The Court resolved that issue on the basis of trial testimony evidence as to how core sizes are understood, determined and classified by those of ordinary skill in the relevant industry. On that evidence, the Court found that there was no infringement of any of the asserted patent claims, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.

Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V. has indicated that it will appeal to the Federal Circuit.

 Top  |  Back to main page




Related Links:

View the Court's Judgment

View the Court's Opinion and Order

Eon Labs, Inc.

View US Patent 5,633,015

Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V.


November 15, 2003

SSJR Argues En Banc Appeal on Inference of Willful Patent Infringement

In an extraordinary decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, ordered consideration by the entire Court of an SSJR appeal covering the appropriateness of inferring willful infringement for failure either to obtain or to disclose an attorney opinion. The current law, which SSJR's appeal seeks to overturn, has been widely criticized by the bar.

 Top  |  Back to main page




Related Links:

View the Briefs and Orders

See a hearing summary



October 1, 2003

SSJR Adds Attorneys

James P. Jeffry and Andy I. Corea have joined the firm as associates.

 Top  |  Back to main page




Related Links:

James P. Jeffry Bio

Andy I. Corea Bio